Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These African Americans results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 526 hits . Analysis detected 4,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,300 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (24,698 of 34,458 keywords). This African Americans is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. African Americans
Keyword details
Total words: 6,300
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst