Keyword summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Carolla results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 1,943 hits . Analysis detected 10,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,116 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,517 of 37,536 keywords). This Adam Carolla is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Adam Carolla
Keyword details
Total words: 7,116
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 27.3% 27.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst