Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoe Sobel results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,688 of 6,348 authors). This Zoe Sobel is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Zoe Sobel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
74%Zoe Sobel (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,596
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.3%9.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos