Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Zach A. Brooks results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 522 hits . Analysis detected 4,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,433 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Zach A. Brooks is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Zach A. Brooks
Author details
Total words: 2,433
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.4% 21.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.1% 12.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 15.2%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 12.1%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst