Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yun Sun Park results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 860 hits . Analysis detected 4,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,512 of 6,534 authors). This Yun Sun Park is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Yun Sun Park
Author details
Total words: 5,928
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.1% 10.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.5% 14.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 10.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst