Author summary
35%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS AP business writer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 235 hits. Analysis detected 2,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,116 of 6,224 authors). This WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS AP business writer is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS AP business writer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS AP business writer (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,336
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos