Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Willow Higgins results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,742 of 6,628 authors). This Willow Higgins is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Willow Higgins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
59%Willow Higgins (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,482
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.6%4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos