Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Hehemann results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 807 hits . Analysis detected 4,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,300 of 6,628 authors). This William Hehemann is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. William Hehemann
Author details
Total words: 5,572
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.8% 12.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst