Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Warren Pederson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 79 faulty-reasoning hits from 297 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,530 authors). This Warren Pederson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Warren Pederson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Warren Pederson (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 297
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles297 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 8.4%8.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos