Author summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Violet Bucaro results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 583 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,197 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (1,565 of 6,360 authors). This Violet Bucaro is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Violet Bucaro
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠76%Violet Bucaro (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,197
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos