Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Veronique de Rugy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 478 hits . Analysis detected 4,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,364 authors). This Veronique de Rugy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Veronique de Rugy
Author details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.2% 13.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 13.3% 13.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.9% 10.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 13.3%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst