Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Venus Beland results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 488 hits . Analysis detected 3,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,620 of 6,171 authors). This Venus Beland is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Venus Beland
Author details
Total words: 4,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.5% 7.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst