Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanja Mutabdzija-Jaksic results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 1,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,344 of 6,172 authors). This Vanja Mutabdzija-Jaksic is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Vanja Mutabdzija-Jaksic
Author details
Total words: 2,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.3%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst