Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tristan S. Rapp results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 360 hits . Analysis detected 2,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,152 of 6,629 authors). This Tristan S. Rapp is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Tristan S. Rapp
Author details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.9%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst