Author summary
50%1 analyzed article/video474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Polanco results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 1,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (996 of 6,628 authors). This Tony Polanco is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Tony Polanco
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
85%Tony Polanco (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,896
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510085.0% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 20.1%20.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Author 20.1%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos