Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Dreisbach results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 990 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (3,027 of 6,387 authors). This Tom Dreisbach is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Tom Dreisbach
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠53%Tom Dreisbach (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 990
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles990 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos