Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Banse results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,244 hits. Analysis detected 7,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,719 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,448 of 6,360 authors). This Tom Banse is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Tom Banse
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
31%Tom Banse (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,719
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate