Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Todd Phillips results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 827 hits . Analysis detected 5,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Todd Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Todd Phillips
Author details
Total words: 5,284
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.7% 15.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 11.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst