Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiffany Hanssen results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 608 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,980 of 6,629 authors). This Tiffany Hanssen is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Tiffany Hanssen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
40%Tiffany Hanssen (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,684
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.9%1.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos