Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Thomas Graham results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 462 hits . Analysis detected 3,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,364 authors). This Thomas Graham is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Thomas Graham
Author details
Total words: 4,176
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.7% 4.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst