Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Intercept results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 787 hits . Analysis detected 4,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 95% (325 of 6,268 authors). This The Intercept is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. The Intercept
Author details
Total words: 2,292
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.8% percentile 10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 23.4% 23.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.4% 11.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 13.0% 13.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.2% 16.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 34.3% 34.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 34.3%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Author 23.4%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 17.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Author 13.0%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 11.4%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst