Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The EcoNews Report results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 1,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 447 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.3% and a BS Rank of 99% (93 of 6,359 authors). This The EcoNews Report is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
The EcoNews Report
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
99%The EcoNews Report (selected)19%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 447
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

99% percentile
025507510098.6% percentile
18.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles447 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 61.1%61.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 45.0%45.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 50.3%50.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 28.9%28.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 26.9%26.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 20.4%20.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 18.6%18.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 15.0%15.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 40.0%40.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 61.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 50.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 45.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Author 40.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Author 28.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 26.9%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 20.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 18.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Author 15.0%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Composition/Division: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos