Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The EcoNews Report results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 273 hits . Analysis detected 1,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 447 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.3% and a BS Rank of 99% (93 of 6,359 authors). This The EcoNews Report is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. The EcoNews Report
Author details
Total words: 447
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.6% percentile 18.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles447 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 61.1% 61.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 45.0% 45.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 50.3% 50.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 28.9% 28.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 26.9% 26.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 20.4% 20.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 18.6% 18.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 15.0% 15.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 40.0% 40.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 61.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 50.3%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 45.0%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Author 40.0%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 28.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 26.9%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 20.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 18.6%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Burden of Proof: Author 15.0%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Composition/Division: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst