Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Curious City Team results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 539 faulty-reasoning hits from 423 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (629 of 6,628 authors). This The Curious City Team is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. The Curious City Team
Author details
Total words: 423
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.5% percentile 7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles423 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.8% 7.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 26.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Middle Ground: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst