Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teri Maddox results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 678 hits . Analysis detected 6,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,161 of 6,498 authors). This Teri Maddox is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Teri Maddox
Author details
Total words: 7,320
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst