Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Widmer results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 3,044 hits . Analysis detected 11,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ā 79% (1,407 of 6,628 authors). This Ted Widmer is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Ted Widmer
Author details
Total words: 6,732
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 39.0% 39.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 45.2% 45.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Politically Left Leaning ā¦ Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 45.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst