Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tebasum Durrani results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Loss Aversion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,586 hits . Analysis detected 6,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,443 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Tebasum Durrani is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Tebasum Durrani
Author details
Total words: 7,443
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.1% 21.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst