Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TC Sottek results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 2,653 hits. Analysis detected 14,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (717 of 6,628 authors). This TC Sottek is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
TC Sottek
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠90%TC Sottek (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,700
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.2% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 46.5%46.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 32.1%32.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 40.7%40.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 28.9%28.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 16.8%16.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 40.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 32.1%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 28.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Author 16.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos