Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tayo Bero results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 990 hits . Analysis detected 6,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (850 of 6,628 authors). This Tayo Bero is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Tayo Bero
Author details
Total words: 3,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.2% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.9% 31.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.2% 22.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.8%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst