Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These TAIJING WU Associated Press results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 1,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,346 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,172 authors). This TAIJING WU Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. TAIJING WU Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 2,346
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst