Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taiga Uranaka results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 175 hits . Analysis detected 859 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,446 of 6,628 authors). This Taiga Uranaka is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Taiga Uranaka
Author details
Total words: 2,312
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst