Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tadeo Ruiz Sandoval results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 95% (344 of 6,362 authors). This Tadeo Ruiz Sandoval is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group. Tadeo Ruiz Sandoval
Author details
Total words: 888
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.6% percentile 10.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles888 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 44.3% 44.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 21.1% 21.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 19.1% 19.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 18.4% 18.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 13.2% 13.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 44.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 28.0%, sitewide 26.9% Loss Aversion: Author 21.1%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst