Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne Blake results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 2,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,973 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,575 of 6,359 authors). This Suzanne Blake is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Suzanne Blake
Author details
Total words: 2,973
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 7.0% 7.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst