Author summary
73%1 analyzed article/video991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne Blake results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 2,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,973 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,575 of 6,359 authors). This Suzanne Blake is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Suzanne Blake
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
60%Suzanne Blake (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,973
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 7.0%7.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos