Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suhauna Hussain results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 4,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,107 of 6,628 authors). This Suhauna Hussain is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Suhauna Hussain
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
38%Suhauna Hussain (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,620
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos