Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stephen Richer results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 435 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,521 authors). This Stephen Richer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stephen Richer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Stephen Richer (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 435
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles435 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.1%36.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 20.2%20.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 16.6%16.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 16.6%16.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.7%14.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 16.1%16.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.4%6.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 20.2%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Author 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Author 16.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 16.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos