Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen R. Nagy results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 237 hits . Analysis detected 1,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of 99% (125 of 6,628 authors). This Stephen R. Nagy is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Stephen R. Nagy
Author details
Total words: 524
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.1% percentile 16.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles524 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 45.2% 45.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 43.1% 43.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 36.8% 36.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 27.5% 27.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 19.5% 19.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 17.8% 17.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 17.9% 17.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 38.9% 38.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 45.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 43.1%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 38.9%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Author 36.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 27.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 19.5%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Author 17.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 17.8%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Author 16.0%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst