Author summary
20%1 analyzed article/video2,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen M. Walt results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 966 hits. Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,066 of 6,628 authors). This Stephen M. Walt is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Stephen M. Walt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
54%Stephen M. Walt (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.4%15.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 11.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos