Author summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 2,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Zimmermann results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 559 hits . Analysis detected 2,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,393 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (6,216 of 6,606 authors). This Stephanie Zimmermann is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Stephanie Zimmermann
Author details
Total words: 6,393
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst