Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Nolasco results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,420 hits . Analysis detected 10,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,848 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,037 of 6,195 authors). This Stephanie Nolasco is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Stephanie Nolasco
Author details
Total words: 10,848
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst