Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacy Perman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 1,166 hits . Analysis detected 7,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,262 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ā 85% (1,035 of 6,628 authors). This Stacy Perman is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Stacy Perman
Author details
Total words: 4,262
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.4% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 25.8% 25.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 25.6% 25.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 27.4%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 25.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 25.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst