Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacey Abrams results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.1% saturation with 2,790 hits . Analysis detected 11,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (734 of 6,629 authors). This Stacey Abrams is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Stacey Abrams
Author details
Total words: 5,456
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.9% percentile 6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 51.1% 51.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 16.8% 16.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 16.9% 16.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 51.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 16.8%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst