Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon Usborne results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,751 hits. Analysis detected 12,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (5,042 of 6,628 authors). This Simon Usborne is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Simon Usborne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠24%Simon Usborne (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,108
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos