Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon Scott results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 319 faulty-reasoning hits from 588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 94% (413 of 6,561 authors). This Simon Scott is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Simon Scott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
94%Simon Scott (selected)10%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 588
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles588 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.5%10.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.4%18.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.5%10.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos