Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shweta Desai results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.3% saturation with 1,041 hits . Analysis detected 2,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,954 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (744 of 6,628 authors). This Shweta Desai is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Shweta Desai
Author details
Total words: 1,954
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.8% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 53.3% 53.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 12.7% 12.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 53.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.7%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst