Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shelby Brown results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,082 hits . Analysis detected 8,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,179 of 6,628 authors). This Shelby Brown is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Shelby Brown
Author details
Total words: 12,784
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst