Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Shane Downing results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,245 hits . Analysis detected 7,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,514 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Shane Downing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Shane Downing
Author details
Total words: 11,514
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst