Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Shane Downing results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,245 hits. Analysis detected 7,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,514 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Shane Downing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Shane Downing
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Shane Downing (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 11,514
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos