Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seth Ackerman results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Recency Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 250 hits . Analysis detected 2,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (274 of 6,460 authors). This Seth Ackerman is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Seth Ackerman
Author details
Total words: 804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.8% percentile 11.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles804 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 24.3% 24.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 22.4% 22.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.1% 31.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.0% 17.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 13.1% 13.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.7% 17.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 31.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 24.3%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 22.4%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.4%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Author 12.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst