Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sebastian Charleton results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 702 hits . Analysis detected 4,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,523 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,147 of 6,630 authors). This Sebastian Charleton is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Sebastian Charleton
Author details
Total words: 2,523
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.7% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.8% 27.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.4% 20.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.9% 13.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 22.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Circular Reasoning: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst