Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Scott Wong results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Recency Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 378 hits . Analysis detected 725 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Scott Wong is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Scott Wong
Author details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.4% 15.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst