Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saul Austerlitz results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 1,728 hits. Analysis detected 8,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,181 of 6,321 authors). This Saul Austerlitz is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Saul Austerlitz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%Saul Austerlitz (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,060
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 34.1%34.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.1%26.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 34.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 14.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos