Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sarah Safer results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 466 hits . Analysis detected 4,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Safer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sarah Safer
Author details
Total words: 2,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 15.1% 15.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.9% 15.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst